7/06/2009

Jonathan Broxton Is A Robot

Alireza, a frequent commenter on this site, wanted to give his thoughts on how good Jonathan Broxton has been this year. His article may seem ill-timed now, but in all fairness to him, he submitted it to me on Saturday, and I was the one that wanted to delay its publication.

While some might say that Jonathan Broxton's latest outing negates the point of Alireza's article, I disagree. In my opinion, this is as good a time as any to remind all the Dodger fans out there exactly how spoiled we've been this year. It's also a good time to remind people not to panic.


Leading into the season, many were doubting Jonathan Broxton's ability to be the top tier closer a World Series contender needs. Some, like Marc Hulet over at Fangraphs, thought Big John should, at a minimum, be relegated to a platoon with Hong-Chih Kuo, who was dominant last year. Granted, everyone knows Kuo's injury history and it has sadly taken him out of the Dodger bullpen again this year.

So what has the Ox done to silence his critics? He has quite simply brutalized major league hitters and become the most dominant relief pitcher in baseball. Broxton has put up strikeout numbers, 14.81 K/9, that look like they belong in a video game and has combined that with the kind of control that would make his mentor, Takashi Saito, proud. Broxton's K/BB is an absolutely sick 4.77, and his WHIP is 0.77. That's right, Broxton gives up less than one walk or hit per inning. He has given up a ridiculous .131 BAA, and has been even better against lefties at .074, even though he has actually faced more southpaws. Indeed, as pretty as his 2.15 ERA going into Friday's perfect performance was, it is almost a full run higher than his FIP of 1.20. How dominant is that? His current FIP after approximately half the season is better than any season that Mariano Rivera, Dennis Eckersley, Lee Smith or Trevor Hoffman ever had. The only closer I could find that has ever been more dominant was Eric Gagne in his legendary 2003 season.

Sounds like Big Jon has put a gag on all his critics.

How does he do it?

So we know just how good Broxton has been empirically, but how has he gotten there? Basically, he has done it by taking his two pitch arsenal to a new level.

We all know Broxton throws hard, but he is throwing even harder than ever. This has likely come from his body's own maturation (he just turned 25 last month) as well as the fact that he appears to have cleaned up much of his previously iffy mechanics. Whatever the reason, Broxton is officially averaging 97.5 MPH on his fastball according to the PitchFX tool, 1.2 MPH higher than last year. I say "officially", because PitchFX is notoriously buggy, and has had trouble distinguishing between sliders and fastballs. In fact, I noticed no fewer than four 90-91 MPH sliders being scored as fastballs in a recent game. Given that, it is likely that Broxton is actually averaging 98 MPH. Needless to say, that is fast, and he only seems to be getting better. In Friday's game at PETCO, he struck out Kevin Kouzmanoff with a high fastball clocked at 103 MPH. That is just not fair, especially considering that Broxton also showed 10" of horizontal movement tailing in on the right-handed Kouzmanoff. Perhaps even more unfair was Broxton's 102 MPH first pitch strike to Eliezer Alfonso, which hit the outside corner and had 15" of arm-side horizontal movement.

Even more impressive, and more important to his success this year, has been the development of Broxton's secondary pitch, a hard slider that acts more like a curveball up in the zone and like a tradition slider when thrown down. While command has never actually been a huge problem for Broxton when looking at the numbers, almost all of the struggles he has had have come as a result of his loss of faith in and inability to command his slider. That has changed completely this year, and has been reflected in the fact that Broxton has thrown his slider 29.2% of the time this season, as compared to 22.0% of the time last year. He has reduced his fastball use by an equal amount, going from 75.4% to 68.2%. This obviously keeps hitter more off balance, and may well be helping his velocity, as he isn't throwing as hard as often and is preserving arm strength.

This is all borne out in the numbers, which say that Broxton's fastball isn't his most valuable pitch. Indeed, Broxton's slider has actually been worth 2.2 runs more than his fastball this year, having already saved the Dodgers 8.3 runs.

One More Thing

There is one other thing that has really made Broxton shine this year. We have always known he can strike people out, and his control, which has never been poor by any means, has been sublime. The biggest change, however, has been Broxton's Derek Lowe-esque worm killing tendencies. Broxton's GB rate has soared to 56.7% this year, and his GB/FB is 2.71. His LD% has remained fairly steady at 22.4%, which means his .253 BABIP is not a fluke. Essentially, Broxton has been attacking hitters low, particularly with the slider, and has been inducing ground balls at a very high rate. If Broxton's newfound command of his slider, not to mention the consistent destruction of the 100 MPH barrier, hasn't scared hitters enough, the fact that they are pounding everything into the dirt must be.

Conclusion

Jonathan Broxton isn't just a promising young player anymore. He isn't merely top-tier closer either. He is quite simply the best, most dominant relief pitcher in baseball.

15 Comments:

kensai said...

I still agree with the conclusion. I struggle to think of any other reliever I would trade him straight up for.

telciram said...

We should lock him up.

Also, Kensai, colletti stands a good chance of being exec of the year, how do you feel about that? Lol.

kensai said...

I wouldn't be surprised.

There are people that left Matt Kemp off the All-Star squad, but included Jason Marquis, so it doesn't shock me that there are those who think Ned Colletti is intelligent.

telciram said...

Ehh, I've never thought lowly of colletti. He's made some big mistakes, but those mostly fall on the shoulders of under performing players. You have to admit that he's made some nifty moves.

I'm almost happy, in a way, that Kemp's not on the roster, because it'll only help him out in arbitration. And knowing McCheap, we might lose him if he gets too much.

kensai said...

Did they underperform?

Pierre has always been terrible, Jones was declining already, and he knew Schmidt was hurt when he came in. That's all besides signings like Tomko or whatever.

All his trades have been terrible except Ethier for Bradley and Perez.

I don't see it. I'll review his history eventually.

telciram said...

Well, you forgot the Manny and Blake trades, and you have to consider the signings of hudson, wolf, ausmus and loretta. I think that he was a horrible GM in the past but is starting to pull it all together. Almost every move before Blake IMO was horrible, but after the Blake trade his decisions became much smarter.

I do, however, hate McCourt. Cheap bastard.

Penos Cabell said...

Great article.

I was a huge critic of Jonathan Broxton's before the season began. He had me on edge a lot last season. That hasn't been the case this season, as Broxton has been amazing. Sunday was just a bad outing. We are spoiled in LA. Any time Broxton blows a save, he'll get killed by the fans.

kensai said...

telciram-The Manny trade was great, but McCourt pulled the trigger on that deal. Supposedly McCourt also pulled the trigger on the Andruw Jones deal, so I guess they even out.

But the Blake trade? Dude are you serious? A half season rental in Casey Blake for arguably the best catching prospect in the minor leagues now in Carlos Santana? That was absolutely atrocious.

The Wolf signing seems like a great deal right now. Ausmus looks like a quality backup. Jury is still out on Loretta and Hudson.

Colletti has made good signings on smaller guys in the past. Guys like Saenz or whatever, but he just messes up larger, franchise crippling deals, and gets zero value from trades.

Furcal is one that is bothering me right now. Hopefully he turns it around, but it's not looking good.

Penos-I would like to see him turn in a string of scoreless innings before the break, just to get back on track. I'm hopeful. :o

Jordan said...

I think that Broxton was screwed by Torre's decision making on Sunday. Nobody was warming up during the top of the 9th inning for the Dodgers. Torre fully expected Bills to pull it out, but then in the bottom of the 9th he got Broxton up in a hurry and put him in without properly being able to warm up. The result was a very bad inning mostly due to poor control.

kensai said...

Yeah, but more than that i'm just worried about the 4 ER he gave up about a week earlier as well. Hopefully he's not hiding an injury or something, it doesn't seem like it.

But I totally agree that he rushed Broxton into the game. I was so puzzled by it because it wasn't a save situation, and Billingsley was not even over 100 pitches. He could have let him face another batter at least. Geez. Fans want to whine about him not throwing complete games and shit, but if you don't give him the chance, he'll never learn to do it.

Alireza said...

Kensai - I do think the toe thing was worse than Broxton let on, and that affected his performance in the back to back games where he allowed 2 ER. I don't think Sunday was an injury, rather a hasty warm up in a less than ideal situation. His performance on Friday, as documented in the post, makes it really hard to point to an injury.

telciram said...

Throwing in Santana for 2mil was probably something that McCourt ordered OR a result of payroll constrictions that Colletti was under.

Besides, Santana isn't doing all that great in the minors.

kensai said...

Alireza-He needs to take care of his toe, because now with Belisario going down, the Dodgers absolutely cannot afford to get thinner in the pen.

telciram-Colletti wasn't forced to give up Santana, specifially. The Indians got LaPorta for Sabathia, and i'm sure they would have taken less than Santana for 2 million dollars.

Not doing that well in the minors?

.271/.404/.518/.923 in AA from a 23-year-old recently converted catcher? He walks more than he strikes out for godsakes.

He would be far and away the best prospect the Dodgers have.

telciram said...

Well, ok, that's pretty good, but we have Martin, May, and Ellis so it's not like we're not deep.

kensai said...

Ellis is a reserve at best, maybe replacement level.

May might be a marginal starter.

Martin is good.

The problem is the value, as always. Saying "well we have Martin anyway" is not justification for making a bad trade. I'm not willing to trade away Gordon and DeJesus because "we have Furcal anyway".

It's trades like that which might prevent us from getting Halladay. Santana could be a legit centerpiece in a trade for this year.

Even if he ends up amounting to nothing as a major leaguer, the trade value would be immense right now.